You take the question as settled by people who have looked at it properly, and follow the age-banded guidance: none under eighteen months, an hour or so for the under-fives, consistent limits after that. The appeal is that it removes the argument from the household and puts it somewhere external, which is a real benefit and not a lazy one.
What it asks of you
- Keeping up, since the guidance has moved a lot and will move again
- Tolerating that the most-quoted numbers are the least evidence-based part of it
- Enforcing a limit you did not personally set, which is easier in some households and harder in others
No externally imposed limit, on the argument that a child who has never regulated their own use has not learned to, and will meet the problem later with less support and a worse device. You talk about how it feels, you notice out loud when an afternoon has gone, and you let the natural consequences — the wasted Saturday, the bad sleep — do the teaching. The position demands a great deal of trust and is the one most likely to be regretted.
What it asks of you
- Genuine nerve, and a long horizon before it looks like it is working
- Frequent, non-judgemental conversation, which is more work than a timer
- Watching a child overdo it without stepping in, repeatedly
- An honest look at whether this is a position or a surrender — they look identical from outside