Screen time is the household currency: earned by the things that need doing, removed when things go wrong. It is easily the commonest approach in practice and the least often defended in print, which is a gap rather than a verdict. It works, in the sense that it reliably moves behaviour, and the thing it teaches about screens is that they are the most valuable thing in the house.
What it asks of you
- A clear, stable list of what earns what, or it becomes a daily negotiation
- Willingness to follow through on removal when that will ruin the evening
- Accepting that contingency makes a thing more desirable, which is the mechanism working against you
No externally imposed limit, on the argument that a child who has never regulated their own use has not learned to, and will meet the problem later with less support and a worse device. You talk about how it feels, you notice out loud when an afternoon has gone, and you let the natural consequences — the wasted Saturday, the bad sleep — do the teaching. The position demands a great deal of trust and is the one most likely to be regretted.
What it asks of you
- Genuine nerve, and a long horizon before it looks like it is working
- Frequent, non-judgemental conversation, which is more work than a timer
- Watching a child overdo it without stepping in, repeatedly
- An honest look at whether this is a position or a surrender — they look identical from outside