The objection is not to the screen but to consumption, so the answer is production: making, coding, editing, building, and understanding how the feed decides what it shows you. Time spent creating is not counted the same way as time spent watching, and a child who knows how the machine works is treated as better defended than a child kept away from it.
What it asks of you
- An adult who will actually sit and build something with them
- Distinguishing making from watching in practice, which is harder than it sounds
- Resources — a device good enough to make on, and time to learn alongside them
You take the question as settled by people who have looked at it properly, and follow the age-banded guidance: none under eighteen months, an hour or so for the under-fives, consistent limits after that. The appeal is that it removes the argument from the household and puts it somewhere external, which is a real benefit and not a lazy one.
What it asks of you
- Keeping up, since the guidance has moved a lot and will move again
- Tolerating that the most-quoted numbers are the least evidence-based part of it
- Enforcing a limit you did not personally set, which is easier in some households and harder in others