No time limit at all. Instead, screens are excluded from places and moments: not at meals, not in bedrooms, not in the hour before bed, not in the car on short journeys. The claim is that the damage screens do is mostly displacement — of sleep, of conversation, of going outside — so protecting what they displace is more precise than rationing the screen itself.
What it asks of you
- Rules that bind the whole household, visibly, including the adults
- Holding the bedroom rule when every other family has stopped
- Accepting that the total will sometimes look alarming, because you are not counting it
You take the question as settled by people who have looked at it properly, and follow the age-banded guidance: none under eighteen months, an hour or so for the under-fives, consistent limits after that. The appeal is that it removes the argument from the household and puts it somewhere external, which is a real benefit and not a lazy one.
What it asks of you
- Keeping up, since the guidance has moved a lot and will move again
- Tolerating that the most-quoted numbers are the least evidence-based part of it
- Enforcing a limit you did not personally set, which is easier in some households and harder in others