The position is that the hour is not the unit — the thing on the screen is. A carefully chosen library, no autoplay, no algorithmic feed, no advertising, and then considerably less anxiety about the clock than most households have. It maps onto the evidence better than a time limit does and it is more work up front, because someone has to do the curating.
What it asks of you
- Real effort choosing, and re-choosing as they grow out of things
- Fighting the platforms, which are built to defeat exactly this
- Holding the line on feeds and autoplay, which is where it actually breaks
You take the question as settled by people who have looked at it properly, and follow the age-banded guidance: none under eighteen months, an hour or so for the under-fives, consistent limits after that. The appeal is that it removes the argument from the household and puts it somewhere external, which is a real benefit and not a lazy one.
What it asks of you
- Keeping up, since the guidance has moved a lot and will move again
- Tolerating that the most-quoted numbers are the least evidence-based part of it
- Enforcing a limit you did not personally set, which is easier in some households and harder in others