The position is that the hour is not the unit — the thing on the screen is. A carefully chosen library, no autoplay, no algorithmic feed, no advertising, and then considerably less anxiety about the clock than most households have. It maps onto the evidence better than a time limit does and it is more work up front, because someone has to do the curating.
What it asks of you
- Real effort choosing, and re-choosing as they grow out of things
- Fighting the platforms, which are built to defeat exactly this
- Holding the line on feeds and autoplay, which is where it actually breaks
No time limit at all. Instead, screens are excluded from places and moments: not at meals, not in bedrooms, not in the hour before bed, not in the car on short journeys. The claim is that the damage screens do is mostly displacement — of sleep, of conversation, of going outside — so protecting what they displace is more precise than rationing the screen itself.
What it asks of you
- Rules that bind the whole household, visibly, including the adults
- Holding the bedroom rule when every other family has stopped
- Accepting that the total will sometimes look alarming, because you are not counting it